Harward law professer Lawrence Lessig is one of the most recognized copyright experts in the world. When giving public presentations, he regularly includes short video clips to make his point. Obviously, these video quotations are covered by the fair-use-clause in US copyright. Residing in Germany, however, YoutTube does not allow me watching the video of one of Lessig’s talks embedded below. I stumbled upon the link to the video as a Slovenian colleague, Domen Bajde, recommends it to his students in a course on global business environments. When clicking on the link, YouTube just tells me that
“Dieses Video enthält Content von UMG. Es ist in deinem Land nicht verfügbar.” (translation: “This video contains content from UMG. It is not available in your country.”)
Previously on this blog, I have described how such problems arise as a consequence of (re-)negotiations between platform providers such as Google (the owner of YouTube) and rights holders, which demand a share from the platform’s ad revenues and hold content created and shared by users hostage (see “Private Negotation of Public Goods: Collateral Damage(s)“). The funny thing is how this erects new and increasingly ridiculous barriers in the seemingly global online world that are still tied to national borders. As an Austrian living in Germany, for example, I can only watch every second video shared by my Austrian friends via Facebook. Obviously, I am not the only one annoyed by this phenomenon. Paul Mutant, a Hungarian artist currently living in Brighton, U.K., converted his frustration into the great painting featured below.
Online video sharing platforms are not the only cases of increasingly absurd inconveniences due to artificial and mostly incomprehensible borders erected in the realm of transnational business. DVD region codes are another example: while pirated or downloaded copies of a movie will work anywhere, legally purchased DVDs only work on players with a corresponding region code. The arbitrariness of this system was evidenced by the creators of the region code system themselves when they reduced the number of different regions to only three for the DVD-successor Blue-Ray Disc.
Taken together, YouTube’s selective blocking of videos in certain areas and region codes for video discs demonstrate at least two things: first, both show the power of technological measures in regulating access to digital goods, which may effectively overrule rights granted to individuals by law. Second, both are examples for continued or retroactively reinstated importance of national borders in the realm of seemingly global flows of communication and services. Google and others are still governing across – and not beyond – borders, after all.
(leonhard)
PS: Since I am not able to watch the Lessig-video embedded above – can anyone not living in Germany comment on what it is actually about? Thanks!
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 12, 2010 at 02:05
Phil
Just to tantalise you a little further Leonhard: The video may be private (i.e. unaccessible to some) but Lessig suggests a solution; and it is also private. (He also resolves the fundamental tension between Einsteinian physics and quantum mechanics, just on the side) Too bad you can’t watch it. Here’s a thought, maybe: How much would you be willing to pay? ;)
December 16, 2010 at 11:41
Viral Web Videos and Blocked Talent «
[…] discussed before on this blog (“This Post is Not Available in Your Country” and “Private Negotation of Public Goods: Collateral Damage(s)“), many user created […]
April 16, 2011 at 13:21
Crazy Copyright Cartoon: The YouTube Copyright School «
[…] YouTube’s copyright infringement policies. As repeatedly discussed on this blog (e.g. “This Post is Available in Your Country“) and described by fellow workshop participant Domen Bajde (see “Private Negotiation of […]
June 7, 2011 at 08:42
Art Across Borders: Paul Mutant’s “This Painting …” in Budapest «
[…] are still tied to national borders. In this context, about eight months ago our article “This Post is Available in Your Country” featured a painting by the Hungarian artist Paul Mutant that ironically addressed the […]
July 1, 2011 at 16:28
The Dark Side of Copyright’s Force: LucasArts v. YouTube v. Greenpeace v. VW «
[…] a big deal – and again questions the three-strikes-rule practiced by YouTube (see also “This Post is Available in Your Country” and “The YouTube Copyright […]
May 31, 2014 at 12:06
Algorithm Regulation #6: The Right to Be Forgotten and the Regulation of Algorithms |
[…] to YouTube’s video blocking practices that differ from country to country (see “This Post is Not Available in Your Country“) and previous differences in search results between Europe and the US (for example with […]